Nerusama no Densetsu [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
TV's Mr. Neil

[ My silly webcomic | Dasien: Superhero Girly Goodness! ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Superman in Metal [May. 9th, 2008|03:00 am]
[Tags|, ]

Call me dorky, but I've always kind of thought that of all of John Williams' scores, the Superman theme would be awesome if it were to be adapted into heavy metal. The theme opens with that swelling chug, it's got a gallop that would make Steve Harris proud, it's got lots of powerful sections that would work excellently on guitar, and, best of all, it's even got several parts where you KNOW there's a cue to sing Superman's name along with the music.

Look up in the sky!
Who's that guy?
Beat up the bad guy!
SUPERMAAAAN!


...Er ...Actually, that would be the lame version, but I posted that knowing that it will be stuck in your head from now on, thus torturing my readers for years to come. Every time you hear the Superman theme, you will hear those lyrics in your head and curse my name. Yes, I am such a bastard.

Anyhoo, I went over to Youtube to see if anyone out there shared my warped revelation that the Superman theme should have a metal tune. Much to my surprise, there are actually a couple people out there who've recorded themselves playing it. None of them are particularly outstanding, but this one sort of has the right idea, I think.


...Not to sound like Strong Bad or anything, but that could have used a lot more chugga-chuggas and meedly-mees, but not bad.

Of course, the worlds of heavy metal and superheroes have crossed, and just like Mr. Reece getting chocolate in his peanut butter, the result was oh, so good! Thank you, Paul Gilbert!

linktalk nerdy to me

Crossoverlord Page 4 [May. 8th, 2008|05:45 pm]
There was a new page of Crossoverlord last Tuesday, even though I completely forgot to mention it. Guess my attention was really divided this week.

http://www.drunkduck.com/Crossoverlord/index.php?p=395217

Dead Debbie's introduction concludes this week. Next week: MINDMISTRESS! ...And then two weeks after that, DASIEN!
linktalk nerdy to me

Wow... [May. 6th, 2008|11:00 pm]
[Tags|, ]

The most amazing thing happened today.

But before I even get to that, let me backtrack a bit and tell you about my family. My sister and I were never brought up with any sort of religious values. It was completely absent. We were told that there was a God, that he loved us, and, if we're good, there's some magical place we go when we die. Now, that may sound like religion to you, but there was no practice beyond that. We never went to church. We were never taught about Jesus. We didn't even have a Bible in the house. It was basically a universalist upbringing.

Of course, it didn't take me very long to look around at all my friends and realise that there were other flavors of theism. Of course, I wanted to know why we believed one thing and other people believed another, and there was never an answer. After a while, I started asking even more interesting questions, such as the strange preference for monotheism over polytheism. Honestly, what's so implausible about the latter if we already believe the former? Again, no real answer.

So, obviously, I came to the conclusion that this belief that we had was tacked-on and completely unnecessary. And from that point on, it was kind of strange approaching the subject with my family, because it felt like I had walked away from something that everyone else seemed to value intensely, even though our brand of theism was as innocent as it was (universalism is about as secular as theism gets, next to deism).

So, today, my mother has the whole family over tonight, and we're talking over dinner. Now, my family knows that I'm an atheist, but nobody's ever really cornered me on it. ...until tonight, that is! And it wasn't at all what I expected. I expected a lecture. Since I have a tendency to speak out against believers, I expected to hear, "You shouldn't be disrespectful of people for having different beliefs.". ...but that didn't happen. Instead, my family totally came out to me. My mother, my sister, and my uncle all basically told me that they are totally agnostic.

Now, normally, I would groan at the term "agnostic", because of several run-ins I've had with certain internet agnostics. You know the types. The ones who think that it's arrogant for atheists to outright reject the alleged existence of whatever arbitrary supernatural being (in this case, a god) they think we ought not to dismiss. And yet, the same argument could be applied to other supernatural things, such as pixies, but nobody's agnostic of pixies. The notion of pixies is dismissed outright, as it should. Atheists simply argue that gods are in the same realm of unverfied claims as pixies.

Rather, the agnosticism that I encountered tonight wasn't that kind of agnosticism. Rather, it was a refreshing sense of indifference. In other words, to the subject of God's existence... eh... they could really give a damn. But there is a definite preference for people who choose to think about morality rather than fishing it out of an archaic book written by ancient sheep hearders. Better to be thoughtful than mindlessly obedient.

It was just so strange to hear this, because I never knew that unbelief was a progressive force sweeping through my family. For all I knew, they were still the same bunch of God-Lite believers that they were when I was a kid. I just assumed that I was the black sheep and they were just letting me have my little space and they politely disagreed. Absolutely not! Somehow.... somewhere... my family finally kicked away the final vestige of theism.

...of course, considering that we started out universalist, it wasn't exactly a tough shackle to shake free.

And then the conversation turned into this really funny topic about how characters from the Bible, assuming they even existed, would be in jail today. We speculated as to whether or not Jesus would be locked up, but we concluded unanimously that Moses and Abraham would definitely be in jail if they existed in today's society.

My mom even went on to state that Abraham, who is the founding figure of all three of the major religions, was clearly delusional or perhaps even eating shrooms on the day that he decided to sacrifice Issac. But thank goodness he had that second hallucination in which God told him to stop!

It was just a laugh-a-minute table conversation over dinner. It was good and therapeutic.

And best of all, the weirdness isn't there anymore.

Well, I'm gonna sign off for now. I'mma go watch TV. There's a special about the disappearance of Madalyn Murray O'Hair on Investigation Discovery starting... RIGHT NOW!
link7 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Jackie Chan is Awesome [May. 6th, 2008|06:30 pm]
[Tags|, ]

James Rolfe provides yet another tribute to Jackie Chan.

By the way, if you're reading this RIGHT NOW at 6:30, tonight is the airing of the episode of Wheel Of Fortune I attended. You can't see me in the audience, though.
linktalk nerdy to me

Holy Crap, Mrs. Crapperson! It's the Strong Bad Videro Game! [May. 5th, 2008|11:50 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

Riddle: What do you get when you combine the geniuses behind Sam & Max with the geniuses of Homestarrunner.com? Well, aside from a major release of every bodily fluid imaginable directly into your shorts, you'll also get Strong Bad's Cool Game or Attractive People!

Yes, so it seems that even hold-outs like me finally have an excuse to buy a Wii (other than Virtual Console, of course).
More awesomeness: http://homestarrunner.com/sbcg4ap.html
linktalk nerdy to me

Too darn cute! [May. 5th, 2008|03:00 pm]
[Tags|]

Wook at da kyute widdle squirrel!

This is a Thunderfoot video. According the video description, he found the baby squirrel abandoned and in the middle of a road. He rescued it, nursed it back to health, and then gave it a new home in an animal santuary.

linktalk nerdy to me

Dasien this weekend? Maybe? [May. 1st, 2008|08:10 pm]
Working on it. Have a ton of stuff to do, but I think I can squeak one out.
linktalk nerdy to me

Rocky Jumped A Park Bench [Apr. 30th, 2008|05:25 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

There are only a handful of people on the entire internet I'd actually like to meet. James Rolfe is one of them. Everyone knows him at the Angry Video Game Nerd, but when he's not taking a dump on old NES cartridges, throwing hadokens at old consoles, or harassing the Wally Bear hotline, he's actually one of the most astonishingly pleasant people I've ever seen. Even not having met him in person, I'm amazed everything I hear him interviewed or see him unscripted on the internet. He's almost bashful when confronted by his adoring fans.

It's rare that we get to see the real James in a video, but every now and then, he lets his guard down and gives us a moment where he is the one acting like a fan. Check out his recent tribute to Rocky.

linktalk nerdy to me

New comics for EVERYBODY!!! YAY! [Apr. 29th, 2008|04:45 pm]
New Enerdas (from yesterday)
http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien/?p=395124

And a new Crossoverlord!
http://www.drunkduck.com/Crossoverlord/?p=395216
linktalk nerdy to me

Pat Condell: Cynicism With A Smile [Apr. 28th, 2008|07:00 pm]
[Tags|, , ]

There are a lot of great atheist YouTube channels out there, but this guy's channel is one of the best. Pat Condell is a great man whose channel you should subcribe to, because you won't regret it. Every time he updates, I squeal with delight.
Wasn't that great?! I love how he maintains a rather jovial and pleasant demeanor as he justifiably bashes George Bush and Tony Blair. Oh, those wacky British and their subtle humor! I love them so much.

Peace!
link1 smartass remark|talk nerdy to me

Why Atheists Always Win Debates [Apr. 28th, 2008|12:00 am]
[Tags|, , , ]

If you've ever been on YouTube and looked up science/creation or atheism/theism arguments, you may notice a pattern in the names people select for themselves. The following video speculates that perhaps the way people name themselves is a subconscious reflection of whether the person is on the side of truth and justice or has aligned himself with the forces of EEEEVIL!

Behold...

And although the video doesn't mention him, the phenomenon also applies to the heroic Thunderfoot.

EXCELSIOR!
linktalk nerdy to me

E to the D to the Update, G [Apr. 26th, 2008|02:45 pm]
Another episode of Energize/Dasien on the internet, for you lucky people out there.

http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien?p=394799
linktalk nerdy to me

Drawing Female Tutorial [Apr. 25th, 2008|08:45 am]
[Tags|, , , ]
[mood | amused]



This is actually a pretty neat tutorial in which Steve shares with us his theory for drawing women, which isn't a whole lot different from most other males. Personally, I usually draw the head first, but to each his own.

Actually, the reason I posted this has pretty much nothing to do with art. See, for years, Jen and I have been at odds over "proper" art supplies and what constitutes as the "right way" to illustrate. Jen not only teases me for pretty much using cheap paper anyone can buy at the grocery store; she lambasts me every time she sees me using a No 2 pencil and pink eraser. I don't see what the big deal is. The final product is going to be converted to digital anyway. The initial line art is essentially thrown away.

So, I boot up this video this morning, and I notice immediately that here we have a professional artist, showing us his tricks of the trade, and what does he have in his hand? A No. 2 pencil with a standard pink eraser.

Har-har, Jen! I win.
linktalk nerdy to me

Possibly the most offensive thing I'll ever post... [Apr. 24th, 2008|04:30 pm]
[Tags|, ]

...although I don't know WHY! Christians went to go see this movie in droves. Clearly, they were happy to watch Jesus getting beaten, so why not make a Wii game out of it? One such YouTuber asked that very question...


You know, if they actually made a Passion video game, they should give it a combo system, hidden/unlockable weapons, finishing moves, humiliation movies (i.e., an end zone dance), a time-attack mode, and an instant replay mode.

See? I told you it would be offensive.
link3 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Neil pies Ben Stein in the face! [Apr. 24th, 2008|02:50 pm]
[Tags|]

OH MY GOD, NEIL! SHUT UP ALREADY ABOUT THIS STUPID MOVIE!!!

Yeah, I know. But this is actually kind of cool. Last week, the National Center for Science and Education ran a contest last week where people could respond to Ben Stein's numerous lies and exaggerations about the theory of evolution. I, of course, picked the biggest whopper I could find. Ben Stein had the termerity to claim that nothing has happened in evolutionary biology since Darwin. I, of course, was ready, willing, and able to load the biggest, creamiest pie I could find and send it sailing into Ben Stein's big fat smug face.

And guess who the NCSE decided to quote. That's-a right! IT'S-AH ME!!!

http://www.expelledexposed.com/index.php/contest/on-advancements-in-science

Unfortunately, they only used a partial quote. I think my full quote is far more pie-tastic, but this certainly gets the point across.
Now, I haven't officially been announced as one of the winners. If I do win, then I get a year's subscription to the NCSE magazine. Keep those fingers and toes crossed, everyone! (Just kidding. That doesn't actually work.)
link2 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Think the eye was designed? Too bad! [Apr. 24th, 2008|08:45 am]
[Tags|, ]

The NCSE is releasing a series of videos on YouTube going after the various creationist claims, and right away, they go after a big one: THE EYE. While the video is simplistic (i.e., it lacks a formal explanation that would require much more time), it demonstrates the having a lack of imagination is not an argument for intelligent design. As usual, it's just an argument from ignorance, as ALL arguments for creation are.


One thing the video doesn't point out is a prefectly sound explanation of why the eye is essentially built upside-down. Photo-sensative cells that detect the top of the image are actually at the bottom, and those that detect the bottom of the image are at the top. But in the video demonstration, you can actually see why this occurs. As the photo-sensative cells cup, the cells on the bottom point upward, and the ones at the top point downward, thus inverting the picture as it enters the eye.

Intelligent design has no explanation for this whatsoever for the eye being built this way, and thus they have to fall back on the old canard, "It was designed that way". Ah, question-begging. Gotta love it.

Why do people laugh at creationists? Only creationists don't understand why.*

*slogan lovingly borrowed from Thunderfoot.
linktalk nerdy to me

New Enerdas! [Apr. 24th, 2008|07:35 am]
Dasien appears at last, and her costume is looking extra shiny and all kinds of sexy. Let the fan service begin!

http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien/index.php?p=394648

I think I'll plug Energize's newest page, too:

http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize/index.php?p=395093

Now in the last scene, Mike and Misty were just starting to snog. So what does Nepath do? He skips ahead to the following morning. D'awww... T-rated comics. Oh well.

The Crossoverlord will continue next week, with Dead Debbie.
linktalk nerdy to me

New cartoonies for you to look at: [Apr. 22nd, 2008|10:00 pm]
[Tags|, ]

*fwumps down on the couch*

Why can't I just go forever like I did when I was a kid? I remember when two hours was a suitable night's sleep. Now if I do that, I pay for it the entire next day.

*points lazily at the computer*

New Enerdas today:
http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien/index.php?p=394647

Who's that whispy-haired heroine lurking in the shadows? One thing is certain. It's not Princess Peach!

New Crossoverlord too:
http://www.drunkduck.com/Crossoverlord/index.php?p=389449

Also, don't miss our mirrors, should Drunk Duck have server trouble:
http://www.webcomicsnation.com/crossoverlord/
http://crossoverlord.comicgenesis.com/

Also, don't miss my latest blog over at www.dasiencomic.net, where I basically reveal just how much of a lecher I really am.

Dasien returning soon...

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm not going to move for several hours. I'm even too tired to fap.
linktalk nerdy to me

The Skeptologists! [Apr. 22nd, 2008|07:21 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Awesomeness...

link1 smartass remark|talk nerdy to me

Ben Stein Crushed Under THUNDERFOOT! [Apr. 22nd, 2008|07:00 am]
[Tags|, , , , ]

Okay, yes, I still have a monsterous bug up my ass about this movie, even though it did absolutely nothing over the weekend. Watch as our old pal Thunderfoot lays to waste any doubt that Ben Stein, co-writer of Expelled, has absolutely zero understanding of the subject matter.


How is it, that in 2008, we STILL have people in this discussion that don't know the fundamental differences between biology, cosmology, and chemistry? You'd think it would be very easy. The etymology alone should reveal the obvious blunders in Ben Stein's amazing stupidity. Biology=life. Cosmology=the cosmos. Chemistry=chemicals. Ben Stein=idiot. See? A third-grader could figure this out.

Now, while Thunderfoot does make a valid argument about the slimey way in which Ben Stein and Mark Mathis went about getting interviews (essentially to gather sufficient footage from which to quote-mine), he failed to produce the single biggest trump card against Ben Stein's claim, which is simply that they had decided upon the name Expelled long before the interviews began. This can be proven by simply going to Who Is and typing in expelledthemovie.com. What you'll see is that the site was registered on March 1, 2007. Richard Dawkins, PZ Myers, Eugenie Scott, and Michael Shermer were all interviewed later that same year.

Changed the name of the movie, eh? Bullshit. You had the title before you even interviewed any of the major biologists featured in the film. The only thing that keeps changing is the story that Mathis and Stein give to the media regarding this issue. To throw your own question back at you, Ben, what are you so afraid of that you have to hide something?


Anyone? Anyone?

Why do people get angry at creationists? Only creationists don't understand why.
link25 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Candidates Vie for the Gooker [Apr. 21st, 2008|09:00 pm]
[Tags|, ]

*headdesks*


You know, the catch-phrases aren't cool when the wrestlers say them. It's even more embarrassing to watch when you have presidential candidates stumbling through them.

That's it! I'm packing my bags and moving to Canada.

I'm gonna email RD Reynolds. I think we have a Gooker winner.
linktalk nerdy to me

Vintage Videogame Review: Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Fall Of The Foot Clan [Apr. 21st, 2008|10:30 am]
[Tags|, , , ]

Well, I'm home today, so I'll be planted in front of photoshop for most of the day.

But to warm myself up (or to make excuses for momentary procrastination), I rolled over to the desk beside my bed and grabbed my GBA for some portable throw-down. I decided I'd go for a classic, so I grabbed my old Ninja Turtle game.


Tonight I dine on turtle soup.


Okay, some history is in order. this game came out three weeks prior to my birthday back in 1990, so in addition to getting Super Mario 3, my father offered to get a Gameboy game. I immediately fingered the new Ninja Turtle game, as it was still in the day that I didn't know any better to not buy property-licensed games. Fortunately, it was a Konami title, so I didn't have much to worry about, anyway.

And since I was always thinking ahead, I actually brought my Gameboy with me so that I could play it on the way home. What followed still stands as my personal all-time fastest completion of any video game ever. I beat the game in fifteen minutes ON THE CAR RIDE HOME. Literally, the credits were rolling as we pulled into the driveway. Considering that this was the day of the old pea-green Gameboy with the blurry screen and the poor lighting, this was nothing to sneeze at.

To my father, who never really understood video games, finishing a game so quickly just meant that it was a colossal waste of money. I didn't understand way. Certainly, when you buy a movie or music album, you're only getting a brief period of entertainment for something that you're going to own for an extended period of time. I didn't see how this was any different. Besides, this game was actually fun, and I'd be playing it again and again.

And indeed I have. Of all the old black-and-white Gameboy games, this stands as one of the true all-time gems, as far as I'm concerned.

So what's this all about? Why are the Turtles chasing after Shredder and Krang this time? Well, again, the game shows its Super Mario roots by giving us yet another damsel-in-distress cookie cutter plot. The Foot have captured April, and the Turtles have to get her back! Why do they kidnap April? I don't know! I guess... to lure the Turtles?

Being the early 90s, the game is based on the old TV series, the one with Cam Clarke as the voice of Leonardo. So naturally, the game maintains the overall appearance of the series, even so far as having still captures from the actual show in between stages. Of course, these were usually accompanied by Engrishy captions which, while not anywhere near as bad as "WE SABE APRUH!", they are just a tad higher than "spoony bard" in terms of intelligability.

The play control is spot on, and the graphics have held up moderately well. They're simplistic, but you can tell who all the characters are supposed to be.

And for being such an old game, the music holds up rather well, too. It's nothing to write home about, but the sewer level theme is rather catchy. And yes, the TV theme is there, too.

The unbalanced collision detection is probably my only gripe, and since it actually works in your favor, it makes the game insanely easy. Basically, the baddies almost have to be on top of you in order to register a hit, but if you so much as look at them with a mean stare, they explode violently. Yes, EVERYTHING explodes.

There are even some exploits you can perform with the controls to basically turn your turtle into into a robot-killing machine. If you find yourself surrounded, you can instantly kill enemies on both sides by simply tapping the attack button and immediately changing direction. Another slighly less useful trick is a two-in-one kick-and-slash attack. As you're coming down from a jump, hit the attack button right before you touch the ground. You'll perform a kick, but as you hit the ground, you'll also swing your weapon. It's a bit harder to pull off, but if you've got two enemies approaching you, you can get both of them with the combo hit.

And I must admit that doing the jump combo is rather superfluous, seeing as the standard weapon has such ridiculous range that you can usually slice through two or three enemies at a time, anyway. It's more of a show-off move than anything.

The game gives you four lives, one for each turtle. Each time a turtle is defeated, they are captured. You don't get any 1-ups or chances to rescue, because you don't need them. This game is only five stages long, and it's so easy, that if you completely fail, just sell all of your consoles and find another hobby.

Should you need an energy boost, there are three mini-games dispursed throughout the levels that will refill your power if you win. They're dumb, but they're worth playing. The first one is a reductionist "guess the number" game, the second is kind of a match stick game played with throwing stars (it defies explanation, but it's pretty stupid), and the third is a shooting gallery.

The enemies are predictable. You have the Foot Soldiers, the Mousers, and whatever those unicycle droids were called. There were also gyrocoptor bugs, which I'm not sure ever appeared in the cartoon series. And there are some more obtuse ones, such as angry missiles, sparks, and pits with flame-faces leaping out of them. What the hell is this? Is Shredder secretly in league with Bowser?

At the end of each stage is a boss. Again, you can probably predict who they are. Naturally, you had the regulars: Bebop, Rocksteady, Shredder, and Krang. At the end of Stage 3, you had Baxter Stockman, who was the unofficial "fifth banana" on the show's villain roster.

As I recall, Baxter was around for about half of the first season before being mutated into a fly. After that, he only made rare appearances.

Anyway, even the bosses are stupid easy. Needless to say, if you can't figure out how to beat Rocksteady or Baxter, you should just give up video games. Bebop is a little harder, but not too bad. Beating Shredder involve attacking him and walking away from his extremely slow katana swipe. And Krang is a little bit a bitch, but if you can jump away after attacking him, you'll easily evade his mighty stubby kick.

Basically, it is what it is, an early-generation Gameboy game. Don't expect a masterpiece, but if you spot it in a discount bin or can get it online for pennies on the dollar, you should probably pick it up. It's good classic gaming that you can fire through in a single sitting.

That's less time than it takes to deliver a pizza!

Don't worry, April! The turtles will be there in no time! Until then, YOU'VE GOT TO FIGHT TO BE FREE!

link1 smartass remark|talk nerdy to me

Like a fart in church... [Apr. 20th, 2008|05:50 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]


A visual metaphor of Expelled's weekend performance.

Far from the projected $23 million that the executive producer forcasted, Expelled, the movie that teachers a new generation of creationists that ad hominem arguments are acceptable discourse, barely broke even at a measley 3.4 mil. To answer the belligerant question, "What are you (Darwinists) so afraid of?", the answer is, obviously, not Expelled, although I'm still worried about America continuing to wallow in the intellectual stupor that even allows such a movie to break even.

Don't worry, Michael Moore, your record is in absolutely no danger. Not that you were worried about it, as you're probably just rolling out of bed right now.

Actually, the movie didn't do too terribly bad, considering its budget. I mean, even for such a poor showing, the movie may actually yet thrive on the same principle of minor success that keeps food on Uwe Boll's table. That is to say, low budgets means that even low grossing movies can profit. Still, once all the money is divvied up, nobody's going to get rich off of this thing.

Better start praying to the DVD fairy, Mathis.


Actual attendance shown of a weekend screening of Expelled

Okay, so it was in the top ten movies this month. But when you consider that it beat out the new Owen Wilson movie, that's not saying much. This is the dead season for movies. If this had been July, Expelled would have been eaten alive. If the movie even tops $5 million, that would be shocking, as the movie will inevitably begin its rapid slalom down the playbill.

I give it another week before it's naturally selected out of the theaters and rendered extinct.

Hey, Ben! America says...
YOUR MOVIE SUCKS!
linktalk nerdy to me

Frontline is made of MAGIC! [Apr. 20th, 2008|04:40 am]
[Tags|]

Well, you guys are probably tired of hearing me rip on Expelled, so...

Last year, I was having all sorts of troubles keeping little creepy crawlies off my kitties. First it was the ear mites, and then there were fleas. EW! Fleas! It was a nightmare. Flea powder didn't work. Bombing the house didn't work. Baths didn't work. Eventually, I just ordered some Frontline.

Holy crap that worked! Fleas... GONE! The only problem is that the ear mites kept coming back. They'd be under control for a while, but then after I was satisfied that they were gone (and once the ear medicine had run out), I'd just assume that the kitties were cured. No such luck.

The problem with ear mites is that they have a fairly long development cycle. It's about a three-week interval between laying and hatching eggs, and the ear drops only work on ear mites that have hatched. That means that you have to give the kitties ear drops every day for about a month to adequately control the little buggers as they hatch. And if you miss a day, you're fucked. And, naturally, if you have two kitties like I do, then you've got them cleaning each other, including the insides of each other's ears, which probably goes a long way to nullify the effectiveness of the ear drops.

So, acting on a tip, someone suggested putting Frontline in the ears. Now that seems odd, because you'd think that putting Frontline on the cat would be enough.

See, the way Frontline works is that, at the risk of being marginally inaccurate, it turns the cat into poison for little creepy crawlies. The fleas bite into the cat, and then the flea dies. It even instantly kills eggs and larvae. No waiting around for eggs to hatch. Nothing. Just INSTANT DEATH!!!!

Well, apparently the ear canal is far enough away from the treated area that ear mites can continue living. By putting the solution INTO the ear (not much is required), it forces the mites out of the ear canal and onto the cat's skin, which is also treated by Frontline. Basically, there's nowhere to go, and so the ear mites simply die.

Well, I did that about two months ago, and it seems to have worked. The waxy build-up that is caused by ear mites has completely vanished, and the cats aren't scratching anymore. I'll keep an eye on it and continue administering the treatment, but if anyone out there has kitties, you may want to try this.

Here's what I did. I first administered the Frontline to the cats on the back of the collar. Then I opened up the applicator and stuck a Q-tip into the remaining residue. With that, swabbed out their ears, using only one swab tip per ear.

If there's a lot of wax build-up in the cat's ears, you may want to clean them out with a damp wash cloth before doing this, just so there isn't any place for the ear mites to hide. But you'll have to wait for the cat to come out of hiding before you do the Frontline treatment, because kitties don't exactly like having their ears washed.

Anyway, that's today's kitty corner. Love your kitties!
linktalk nerdy to me

The superheroine leotard [Apr. 19th, 2008|10:20 am]
[Tags|, ]

In case you're wondering, yes, that's Sue Storm from some early-to-mid 90s Fantastic Four issue. Apparently, that costume didn't last terribly long either, and for once, I think I'm glad. Not that I wouldn't mind seeing Sue Storm running around the Marvel Universe in a leotard, but that particular costume is just a little TOO silly.

I often wonder what girls think of costumes like this. I mean, I know women are going to have varied opinions on things anyway, (just as much as men, obviously), but when it comes to the aesthetics of sexuality, I often wonder how these things register with people who, shall I say, aren't wired the same way I am. Does a girl look at a superhuman pin-up girl and think she looks cool? Does she merely put up with it to appreciate the story? Is it a source of annoyance?

...I know; all of the above. Diversity of thought. Gotcha.

After all, I see some sexified men, and it's the same thing. Some are cool-looking, some are rather silly, and then some are just off-putting. But that's okay. I believe sexism is a two-way road.

I look at characters like Black Canary, Ms. Marvel, Jesse Quick, Wonder Woman, and Caitlin Fairchild, and I think they all look reasonably cool. There's more to the showing of skin. Their costumes actually have a bit of style.

Especially Fairchild's old costume (not lately, obviously). The style and colors of Fairchild's costume are very arresting, because it was more than just a swimsuit. Fairchild is the basis of my theory that zippers, buttons, snaps, and buckles are sexy. (I think it has something to do with implied access.) And admittedly, it's a theory I don't necessarily practice myself.

Strangely enough, the one part of Fairchild's costume I always kind of thought was coolest was her footwear. She didn't have the standard superhero boots. They were more like industrial stength gym shoes. They even have killer treads. I don't think I had ever seen treads on superhero boots before. And since, the only other character I can think of who does is Jesse Quick.

And really, why had nobody else thought of that before? Why the fuck were these stupid comic artists always trying to put heels on the boots? Why was THAT more important than practical athletic shoes?

Err... I better shut up about practical wear, before someone calls me on the irony of female characters wearing skimpy uniforms.

The thing is, I like it when it's more than just a skimpy outfit. In fact, my basis for altering Dasien's costume in the upcoming Crossoverlord was that she was basically walking around in a one-piece, and I thought I could do better. Of course, Al Schreoder is fighting me the entire way. (He's such a fan.)

But I kind of screwed myself, too, because I wanted Das' new costume to be a bit more industrial, with the buttons and buckles, and all that jazz. But in application, I realized that having an organic suit kind of defeated that. Oops.

Oh well. Maybe the next costume will have it. ...and it will ALWAYS be a leotard.
linktalk nerdy to me

Expelled flunks in reviews [Apr. 18th, 2008|02:25 pm]
[Tags|, , , ]

Ah, there's nothing like the sweet, sweet sound of intelligence coming from movie reviewers across the nation:

The New York Times: Resentment Over Darwin Evolves Into a Documentary
Chicago Tribune: Ben Stein Monkeys With Evolution
Chicago Sun-Times: Stein's Case Bad Beyond Belief
E! Review: "Anyone? Anyone?"
Salt Lake Tribune: Stein Shuns Intelligent Debate in Dishonest "Expelled"
Star Tribune: Propoganda piece "Expelled" Flunks
Baltimore Sun: "Expelled" Failing To Make An Argument
The Flick Filosopher: Nazis! It’s all about Nazis!


The single best commentary on the film comes from Maryann Johanson from the Flick Filosopher:
"In a parallel universe even crazier than our own, Ben Stein is making a documentary about how the Nazis utilized the controversial theory of gravity to make bombs that fall from the sky to the earth, and so the theory of gravity must be wrong."

Exactly.

Of course, the opinions of various movie reviewers are largely irrelevent, especially when the movie already has a built in "teh media is ebil" clause. There are better resources for knocking down Ben Stein's wall of lies, damned lies, utter stupidity, and jaw-dropping ignorance. But it does feel good to look through the reviews and see that America is not so easily duped by nonsense.

The scientists are doing a pretty good job of fighting back, but there is one thing that's kinda pissing me off about the way the scientists are handling this movie. They're all pussy-footing around the notion that someone could get fired over intelligent design. Damn it! You don't have to apologize for that! Any scientist who tries to publish a paper that says, "This system is too complex, therefore it was designed by a supernatural being", SHOULD BE FIRED! Any university professor who shows gross incompetence and/or outright lies to his/her students about the nature of a scientific theory SHOULD BE FIRED! Anyone who circumvents the review protocols of a publication for the sake of publishing something that is not appropriate for the theme of that publication SHOULD BE FIRED! We're talking about people who are paid to contribute to the education of tomorrow's thinkers and the improvement of society in general, and we're worried about whether or not they were fired for clearly not doing their jobs. Damn it! You don't need to pay someone to say "God did it". There are people who do that for free on SUNDAY!

FIRED!!!!

But I'm not going to let that spoil my feel-good buzz, because now I hear that the film makers have also drawn the wrath of Yoko Ono, seeing as they chose to use the John Lennon song Imagine without permission. Get 'em, Yoko! Sing at them! Make them beg for mercy.

Unfortunately, I'm still sure that this movie is going to blow the doors off the movie theaters this weekend, but at least we can rest easy knowing when they're putting together the design for the DVD jacket, they'll have to stick to review quotes from religious organizations. There won't be any regular media quotes to put on the jacket. That is, unless they quotemine the reviewers the way they quotemine the scientists.

"This ... is ... a ... movie."
-Chicago Tribune
linktalk nerdy to me

I love Lesbian Pirates... [Apr. 18th, 2008|03:00 am]
[Tags|, ]

http://www.lesbo-vision.com/?p=376958

THANK YOU MEGAN-ROSE!
linktalk nerdy to me

Newness? Actually... yes. [Apr. 16th, 2008|08:10 pm]
[Tags|, ]

I'm not exactly setting the comic world on fire at the moment, but there are two new comics that have started this week both featuring Dasien.

Don't miss these updates!

Energize/Dasien Episode 1
http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien/index.php?p=390192

Energize/Dasien Episode 2
http://www.drunkduck.com/Energize_and_Dasien/index.php?p=390965

Crossoverlord Episode 1
http://www.drunkduck.com/Crossoverlord/index.php?p=389448


In either case, we're within five pages of meeting Dasien, so don't fret any, my patient fans. And in both cases, Dasien's appearance means that the fun is just getting started!
linktalk nerdy to me

Ben Stein Running Scared: Part Three of the Trilogy [Apr. 15th, 2008|01:20 pm]
[Tags|, , , , ]

Ben Stein: "And what I kept wondering as I was making this documentary was, if they're so sure they're right, what are they afraid of?"

Ironic, considering that the producers of Expelled has done everything possible to suppress critical analysis of their film, such as not blocking early viewings by the media and ejecting well-known scientists from a perfectly legal early viewing of the film. As much as the negative publicity for the film made by people like me is likely to send people to see the film anyway, they behavior of those involved with the film is a PR disaster, and the message of the film is so wildly assertive in its portrayal of evolution as a form of Nazi-ism that even FOX NEWS gave it a ho-hum review in the past week.

Indeed, Ben. If people have to suppress their opponents, then what could they possibly be so afraid of?

Is it the fact that your martyr Richard Sternberg was singled out for his gross incompetence and not his theological position? Is it the fact that so-called "social darwinism" has nothing at all to do with and is actually antithetical to the theory of evolution? Is it the fact that your movie doesn't even take the moment to clearly define either side of the "debate", so there's no explanation anywhere as to what evolution and intelligent design even are? Is it the fact you don't even have a theory to provide and therefore there's nothing to even suppress? Is it the fact that, despite your wealth of political knowledge and respectable level of intelligence, that you got caught with your pants down making an ignorant documentary based on a theory that you clearly don't understand?

Even someone as emotionally manipulative as Michael Moore has the courage to thrust his tripe into the arena of criticism, and to his credit, he has no qualms about facing those people with whom he strongly disagrees. Ben Stein, and the producers of Expelled, however, have attempted to ensure that no intelligence is allowed in early screenings of this picture. I never thought I'd find myself in a position where I'd be praising Michael Moore, but I guess there's a first time for everything.

But why should I continue on with my assessment of Ben Stein's inability to rationally approach the subject matter when people more educated and qualified than even myself have done a fairly good job already. Let's go back to our old friend Mr. Thunderf00t and see what he has for us today, shall we?



Now, is it just me, or is Thunderf00t's voice strangely relaxing? By the way, Thunderf00t, I appreciate you using my joke of "Einsteinism", whether or not it was intentional. It makes me feel good when something I say gets echoed in actual academics. After I finish this delightful little post, I'm going to go fist-pump and then pat myself on the back for several hours.

It amazes me how Ben Stein spends so much time talking about Darwin when, by today's research, Darwin's original work is largely superfluous. I'm not denying that it's foundation to modern biology, but I'm merely pointing out that if Darwin hadn't discovered evolution, someone else would have. Indeed, observing the resident birds of a string of islands is largely pointless in contrast to observing endogenous retroviruses and comparative genetics. Today's science of biology is not "Darwinism", Mr. Stein, so if you please, kindly ditch your childish misnomer.



Additionally, the lack of any formal theory of the origin of life in no way constitutes as an argument against a theory that describes the dynamics of a biological system, for much the same reason that Thunderf00t described. You can no more fault Darwin for having no theory of origins than Newton for having no theory of atoms. Do not confuse the function of a natural phenomenon with its origin. In science, such arguments are completely irrelevent, and beligerence will no more make your case than when you presented your argument the first time. Phony arguments repeated ad nauseum will only register a resounding "ugh" from your opponents.



Indeed, all Ben Stein has done is make an argument that appeals to ignorance. What he is doing is no different than accusing modern science of lacking the omniscience to know more than what the limits of current knowledge would allow. In other words, he's being asinine.

Now, I fully encourage people to go see this movie. Unlike Ben Stein, I want as many people to see it as possible. Why? Because I have confidence that most Americans (or in the world, for that matter) will see the film as an insult to their intelligence. This is why, in my first volley posted on MySpace, I chose to make the theme of my presentation be Kent Hovind, so that you can appreciate the shock and awe of someone who is not suppressing the full implications of his cartoon worldview. Indeed, this is the subject matter with which people like Ben Stein want to replace modern biology.

To close this out, I present for one last series of videos by Thunderf00t. In this series, he takes on the Discovery Institute directly and reveals them to be the raving band of absurdists that they really. Much of the video you see in this expose is taken from Icons of Evolution, Discovery Institute's propaganda film prior to Expelled. In the second video, you will actually hear people from the Discovery Institute using an argument that is identical to one used by evangelical absurdist Kent Hovind. And then the argument gets evicerated. Enjoy.


A number of my peers have expressed that this film is due to bomb. I sharply disagree, mainly because it is a propaganda piece, and propaganda sells. It's particularly essential to understand that an alarming number of Americans actually agree with Stein's point of view, which I would think would be enough to get people in to see the movie. Additionally, the promotional campaign is being handled by those who were also on duty for The Passion of the Christ, and we all know how well that did. And if nothing else, the movie falls well within the dog-shit-on-white-carpetting range of things that can't help but draw attention to themselves, despite being utterly repugnant.

But what if my peers are right? I can only imagine the further damage such a box office disaster would do to the already irrelevent Ben Stein, who is only now topical due to this movie. We're talking about the guy who is best known for being the monotone teacher in the movie that was filmed over twenty years ago and for being the speech writer of Nixon, whose only quotable words, "I am not a crook", is one thing that Stein himself surely did not write. What would such a failure do to the career of Ben Stein?


Well, I guess there will always be eye-drop commercials.


By the way, feel free to pass that image around, if you like.
link2 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Ben Stein, Expelled, and Pigeon Holing: Beligerance Is NOT A Form Of Intellectual Discourse [Apr. 14th, 2008|11:00 pm]
[Tags|, , , , ]

So now that I've blogged endlessly about Ben Stein's Expelled, is geared up to go see it? Yeah, I know it's going to suck Yeah, but you know that this movie is going to be preaching to the choir. If it had an actual case to make, it would have done so. Heck, even Michael Moore has the integrity to do that, and his movies are emotional bullshit.

(Editorial Note: I fully encourage anyone who wants to go see Expelled to go see it. Please do. By bashing it as often as I do, I fully expect people to feed their curiousity. Trust me, I'm not the one trying to keep critical minds from seeing this movie.)

(Editorial Note 2: Let's just say that I've seen... enough... of this film to make a fairly informed opinion of it. If you've seen any of Ben Stein's interviews in the last five months, you're not going to see anything new and exciting in the film. The film itself is pretty bad. So bad, in fact, that even FOX NEWS has panned the movie! WOW!)

As expected, Ben Stein's movie offers nothing new to the Evolution Controversy™, except to teach young adults now that all they need now to argue against evolution is to employ ad hominems and shield themselves in a self-imposed victim complex...

University Professor: "Evolution is a theory that describes the dynamics of a biological system.  It is a process of modification that results from diversity via random mutation and then environmentally-imposed natural selection."

Creationist Student: "OH MY GOD!  WHY ARE YOU OPRESSING ME?!?!?!!!!11  MATERIALIST ATHEIST!!!  DRAMA!!!"

And the damage that this movie is causing is already apparant.  I can't even so much as make an informed comment on YouTube about this subject without being met by inflated overconfidence and extreme belligerence from people who have absolutely no idea what they're talking about.

Notice that I get accused of being arrogant and assuming intellectual superiority merely by correctly stating the theory of evolution as a theory of the dynamics of a biological system.  By having the alternative (and correct) definition of evolution, I get accused of impling that I'm smarter than Ben Stein.  This the damage that Ben Stein has caused.  These two poor saps have learned from Stein himself that extreme confrontationalism is enough to win an argument.

(Editorial Note: My friend Marissa pointed out something that I missed. The sort of intellectual elitism that evolutionary biologists are accused of is actually present in the YouTube comments of the intelligent design dorks. Note how Ben's intelligence is godly to them. Good catch, Marissa!)

The sort of the contempt that this new brand of creationism has for informed opinions is best displayed in this animation done by intelligent design moron, Mike Edmondson, who just happens to be listed in the credits of Expelled as animation director.


The arrogance that is projected onto Richard Dawkins in this admittedly amusing video is appalling, as if Richard Dawkins has ever argued "I'm smarter,  because I have PhD".  Seriously, grow up.  This is the product of a mind that willfully constructs a brick wall right in the middle of the intellectual inquiry super highway.

To someone who has, oh say, read a book within the last several years, Ben Stein's ignorance of biology is staggering.  To say nothing of his complete inability to identify the obvious incompatibility between social darwinism and the theory of evolution (the former denounces genetic diversity while the latter glorifies it), it amazes me that Ben Stein is using the same age-old tactic of asking stupid questions such as asking where the laws of thermodynamics and gravity come from.  Surely (don't call him Shirley!), Ben Stein's lofty intelligence is capable of understanding that grilling biology students over questions about cosmology is completely inappropriate.  But then, Ben Stein is a lawyer, and so he argues like a lawyer.  He's playing to an jurybox full of ticket-holding movie-goers, and he knows that there will be no objection in this three-ring circus of a case!

What Ben Stein trying to do is pigeon-hole evolution into being an entirely atheistic worldview.  "Now, Neil," you say, "I've read your profile, and it says that you are an atheist.".  That's true, but irrelevent.  What Ben Stein is trying to do is to change the subject so that biology has to defend more than it was actually intended to.  The basic tenet of evolution, which is to describe the dynamics of a biological system, is not addressed by Ben Stein's arguments at all, and his attempt to club people over the feet based on their epistemology stance is not germane to the conversation. (Enter Jackie Gleeson: "But the Germans ain't got nothin' to DO with this!")

All he's offered is a red herring.


Besides, it must be pretty fucking annoying for those theists in the field of modern biology to get slammed as atheists when all they're doing is responsible scientific research.  Pigeon-holing is not an argument.  It only serves as a diversionary tactic for those ignorant of modern biology.

The illusion of persecution is the latest in a long time of failed attempts by creationists to get their shit passed as science.  They couldn't pass the rigors of peer review (not that they even tried), so then they had to turn to the court of law.  When the law failed, they turned to the court of public opinion, as if public opinion has anything to do with establishing the truth.

In the context of a scientific debate, it is absurd and childish to piss and moan about about the scientific establishment's alleged intolerence of differing perspectives.  The whole point of scientific inquiry is to establish truth based on what can survive the rigors of peer criticism.  In other words, having a perspective in science MEANS that you are going to get grilled for it at every opportunity.  Since Ben Stein doesn't understand this, he's trying to make it seem as though intelligent design has actually brought something to the science forum that those within the establishment are trying to supress.

And what does Ben Stein do in place of having scientific model for intelligent design?  He gets out his rhetorical dance pad and plays Dance Dance Evolution!  He side-steps obvious scientific questions about intelligent design and goes right back into his pajorative name-calling, where he accuses modern biology of being "Neo-Darwinian", whatever the hell that means.

Calling biology Neo-Darwinism is sort of like calling modern physics Neo-Einsteinism, or like calling modern geology Neo-Huttonism.  Whenever someone accuses me of appealing to my Darwinian "high priest", as if there's some sort of cult attached to evolutionary biology, I can't help but ask them what planet they're from.

How do you live on planet Earth, supposedly being a person who watches the average amount of television and reads the newspaper, while having such a tremendously contemptuous view of scientists?  People who hear this kind of nonsense coming from today's intelligent design proponents can only react by scratching their heads and saying, "Huh?".

Most alarmingly of all, Ben Stein's movie is an attempt to teach creationists how to be extremely anti-social.  Instead of trying to understand the basis for theories that they find uncomfortable, it instructs them to be confrontational, libelous, and extremely rude.

If this is really the only tactic that intelligent design has left, then perhaps it would warrant a brief, stlightly arrogant chuckle on my part and on the part of those who defend the science establishment.  Ben Stein's Expelled is actually weaker than the previous crap to come out of Discovery Institute, namely Icons Of Evolution.  At least Icons attempted to have an argument.

Expelled is basically an extended argumentum ad temper trantrum.

link9 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Holy Shit! It's Red Peters! [Apr. 14th, 2008|07:20 pm]
[Tags|, ]

If I should ever compile a list of the top 100 greatest Americans of all time, this man is going somewhere inbetween "Weird Al" Yankovich and Dr. Neil deGrasse Tyson.

This was recorded live on the Howard Stern Show. The music video is synched with the performance.

linktalk nerdy to me

Two Comic Premieres! [Apr. 13th, 2008|12:00 am]
[Tags|, , ]

Energize/Dasien starts Monday!

The Crossoverlord starts Tuesday!
linktalk nerdy to me

Squirrel Car [Apr. 12th, 2008|04:15 pm]
[Tags|, ]

Josh Lensick is thinking about restarting Wendy. Yay!

http://joshl.deviantart.com/journal/17743440/
linktalk nerdy to me

The Deity Protection Program: Keeping your favorite deities safely anonymous! [Apr. 12th, 2008|07:00 am]
[Tags|, , , ]

Okay, boys and girls. It's science rant time! But we're going to do things a little differently today.

Now, I make no secret that I'm an atheist and disagree with literally every form of supernatural belief on a fundamental level. But I get so caught up in my angry tirades, that sometimes I wonder if I generalize too much. After all, I have Christian friends, and I know they're embarrassed by intellectual lag that exists in the Bible Belt. So I'm going to do something nice and show those of you Christians how there how you can deconstruct intelligent design and expose the creationism from within.

But first, here's a video...


About half way through this irritating video, you'll find a CBN (that would be the CHRISTIAN Broadcast Network) interview between Pat Robertson (that would be the CHRISTIAN Pat Robertson) and the latest outted anti-science moron, Ben Stein, talking about evolution, intelligent design, social darwinism, and God (that would be the CHRISTIAN God).

Okay, for Ben Stein, obviously it's the Jewish God, but still it's Yahwey. It's the same guy. But listen carefully as you hear Ben Stein reveal his reason for doubting "Darwinism" (whatever Darwinism is). He starts talking about how it leads to something called "social darwinism", which is the belief in higher races among humanity, and is therefore the seed of racism, sexism, and genocide.

I can only assume that, when talking about social darwinism, ol' Benny is referring to that old "survival of the fittest"/"law of the jungle" nonsense. Yeah, if Ben Stein really thinks evolution is the survival of the fittest, then he needs to go back to high school biology. In real biology, the opposite is true. Modern biology teaches us that diversity is key to survival. But we can't expect Ben Stein to check his facts now, can we? That would require effort. ...like going to the library.

It's just Ben Stein, attempting to pick up where fellow biggot Jerry Falwell left off, trying to irresponsibly smear intellectual progress, because he can't stand seeing his warped theology losing to modernization and a sturdy knowledge base of things that makes have to think twice about the rigid faith he takes for granted.

What's staggering (but not at all unexpected) is that Ben Stein goes right into the same creationist rhetoric that we've heard from morons like Kent Hovind and Duane Gish a million times before. That is that if evolution is true, then Christianity is false, and therefore there is no higher power to answer to and therefore no moral standard. Yadda yadda yadda. So he's obviously talking about religion, and he's talking specifically about a monotheistic deity who wrote ten rules on couple of stone tablets at the top of a mountain and revealed himself in holy scripture. Clearly, he's talking about Yahwey.

But wait! His new documentary Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed clearly makes it a point that the intelligent designer is not necessarily the Christian deity. So then if the problem with evolution is that there's no higher power to answer to, then how does intelligent design solve this? Surely, Ben Stein isn't assuming that intelligent design speaks of a loving designer who created us, gives us moral laws to follow, and punishes us if we do evil things, right? ...Because that would be assuming that the intelligent designer is Yahwey, and intelligent design doesn't make any such claim.

No, the intelligent designer is an anonymous deity. We don't know who he is! *wink!* He's the ethyreal equivelant of John Doe. Or perhaps that would be John DIO. Ah, I've been waiting a long time to use THAT one!

An anonymous deity could be any kind of deity. He could be an evil deity who finds great joy in creating intelligent life only to watch us destroy each other in wars over oil, land, and contradictory dogmas. What a benevolent bastard! On the other hand, the designer could be apathetic. Perhaps he made us because he was bored and moved on. Maybe he doesn't listen to our prayers. These are alternatives that intelligent design must accept if its proponents are to be consistant in their claims.

That means that Ben Stein cannot project moral authority upon this being, unless he's willing to admit that this intelligent designer is one who sits on a big throne in the sky, wearing a crown and has a white beard. But Ben Stein dare not concede to that point. Better to concede that the intelligent designer could, in theory, be a magic sky king douche bag. ...because that's so much better.

And therein lies the irony. It's actually intelligent design in which God is silenced, hidden, and pretty much banned from discussion. There is no God allowed in intelligent design! They dare not speak his name, because it would expose their creationist ruse. Rather, they have to spirit him away (pun fully intended) and put him in the Deity Protection Program, supposedly so that the critics of pseudo-science can't find him. They've robbed God of his very identity. That's no way to treat your personal lord and savior!

And in another ironic twist, if we were to actually take intelligent design at face value, and if we can pretend for a moment that the intelligent designer is not Yahwey, then there's no particular reason to suppose that intelligent design is antithetical to evolution. After all, the so-called "theory" of intelligent design makes no claim as to who the designer is, so for all they know, the intelligent designer could be one who made a universe in which biological systems maintain balance via the process of evolution. If ID proponents deny this, then their ruse is exposed.

In fact, Dr. Kenneth Miller believes in just such a deity, and he has no shame in calling that being God. Amusingly enough, evolutionary biologists are at full liberty to express their theological beliefs! There's nothing about evolutionary theory that prevents one from being a theist, contrary to what lies Ben Stein is putting forth.

It is not evolution that is hostile toward faith. It is the faith... this particular scriptural literalist faith... that is hostile toward modern biology. THEY are the ones who build the false dichotomy between evolution and theistic belief. THEY are the ones who claim that if there's evolution, then there is no God. Evolution, on the other hand, does not say this.

What Ben Stein can't seem to separate in his mind is the difference between personal belief and scientific theories. One is not at liberty to submit faith in a science journal, as one the subjects in his movie tried to do.

See, while Ben Stein tries to pretend as though the interviewees in his film were silenced and/or fired based on their theological beliefs, the truth is that they were singled out for being grossly incompetent. One such interviewee succeeded in abusing his editorial powers to publish an intelligent design article in a science journal by circumventing the standard review process. Guess what, if you work for a publication and ignore standard proceedure, you get fired. ...of course, this jerk didn't have to worry about that, since he was on his way out anyway.

Another sob story in the movie is about a university professor who told her class that evolution is false, because no one has ever observed a dog turn into a cat. Here we have A TEACHER OF STUDENTS who grossly misrepresents a valid theory of science just so she could attack it. Anyone who actually believes that evolutionary theory somehow entails that dogs magically change into cats has no business being a teacher. The faculty of that university acted correctly in the best interests of their student body. After all, if you're paying for education, you have the right not to be tought by an idiot.

These are facts conveniently left out of Ben Stein moronic morality play about suppression, fascism, and biggotry. How ironic that a guy starring in a movie that denounces intellectual suppression actually supports a political agenda called intelligent design that imposes a suppression of its own upon the very character it attempts to liberate from academia.

There is no God allowed in Intelligent Design. But if you're a Christian evolutionary biologist or a Christian who is at least scientifically literate, take comfort in that you don't have to live with the burden of cognative dissonance. You are the ones who don't have to pretend that the designer could be anyone other than God.

And here's a bonus video. This half-hour video pretty much refutes everything Ben Stein's been blathering about on TV lately, and therefore it will probably trounce that stupid movie of his, too...

linktalk nerdy to me

Another self-evaluation post [Apr. 11th, 2008|06:45 am]
So, I started to do one of those self-evaluation posts I do every now and then. Basically, I'm feeling better these days, but as I started talking about how crappy 2007 was for me, I felt myself being dragged down again. It started turning into a depressing post, so I just started over.

Seriously, I am doing better these days. Getting over my dad's rapid decline in health hit me like a ton of bricks. I was obviously completely unprepared for it. It took me a long time to stop blaming myself, as if I somehow have magic powers to stop people from dying of terminal diseases.

I also have some amazing friends who absolutely refuse to let me fall. They really came to my rescue. Every single one of them. They reminded me that I am important, and they need me every bit as much as I need them. I seem to forget that from time to time, as I withdraw myself into a recluse state. My friends have fought to keep me from doing that. They're wonderful people. Mike, Jen, Tom... all those guys.

So, life's pretty good right now. Not perfect, but we're getting there.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm gonna go find one of my kitties.
link2 smartass remarks|talk nerdy to me

Pogo For President! [Apr. 9th, 2008|07:15 am]
[Tags|, , ]

A few posts back, I went on one of my fan-enduced rants about how great the original King Kong is. The movie is a marvel of stop motion animation, even by modern standards. Sure, it's not as polished as the stuff we have today, but it was way ahead of its time.

With he election season upon, how could I nearly forget one of my favorite stop-motion animated features of all-time, Pogo For President?! (a.k.a. I Go Pogo) If I'm not mistaken, I believe it was an adaptation of an earlier body of work by Pogo comic artist Walt Kelly, who was long dead by then. However, I've never seen the actual comic story this is based on.

And not to show my age or anything, but this movie is so old that I actually remember video taping it off of Spectrum, a Chicago-based subscription TV service that worked by descrambling a broadcast UHF signal (Channel 66) during a time that Chicago didn't have cable services. Such a service is absurd by today's standards. Even then, it wasn't tremendously difficult to descramble analog pay channels.

In fact, the TV in my bedroom was notorious for defeating scrambled channels. Hey, it wasn't like I modded it! I just noticed one day that I was picking up Wrestlemania for no apparent reason. It wasn't until some time later that I mentioned it to my dad, who, of course, didn't mind watching a few free movies every now and then at the expense of HBO, Showtime, and whatever pay-per-view service we had. But I think I'm digressing.

The point is that this was the early 80s, and it was back in a day when shit like Gumby was what you had for stop-motion animation. I hate Gumby so much. In contrast, this was incredibly animated, and all you needed was one viewing to spoil you for life. It is impossible to watch Gumby after watching Pogo For President. Pogo truly set a standard that would later be matched (and then surpassed) by Wallace and Gromit.

The voice work was top notch, too, featuring most prominantly the voices of Vincent Price and Jonathan Winters, the latter voicing two roles. The features a number of great actors with whom I'm not fully aquainted, but one that stands out is Arnold Stang, who some of you children of the 80s will remember as the Honey Nut Cheerios Bee.

The movie had a very peculiar theory of color. Like the comic, it didn't use a lot of primary colors. For a film that takes place in a swamp, you very seldomly see the color green (aside from ol' Albert the alligator!). The trees were a very peculiar color, and the folliage was almost blue. Back in those days, I didn't realize that the animators were trying to copy the arresting style of the comic, so I tried in vain to adjust the tint on the TV, much the annoyance of my folks. You could tell that there was care put into this film so as not to dishonor the source property.

Sadly, this was the 80s, and despite all creative attempts to keep this pure and wholesome, there was some 80sness that crept into the picture. Namely the music. While the music, for the most part, stayed in context with the southern setting, it did occaisionally creep into 80s pop by playing a number of irritating songs that had nothing to do with the story. All of a sudden, there'd be a Pogo music video in the middle of the movie.

Also unfortunate is that there are no good videos online of Pogo For President, aside from this clip featuring Porky Pine voiced by Jonathan Winters. It doesn't really do the feature any justice, though.



If you've never encountered Pogo before, you're in for an initial shock. The dialogue is almost entirely done in local color, meaning that everyone talks with a drawl, and the ignorance of the characters is played for comedy. You actually have to stop and think sometimes to figure out what subject matter they're muddling before you get the joke.

For some time, I didn't even realize that Pogo was a comic series. That is until Bill Watterson, author of Calvin & Hobbes, mentioned Walt Kelly as one of his inspirations. It took me some time to track down an actual Pogo comic, and to this day, my own comic collection is sorely lacking. But, I do make an occaisional trip to the library, so I've been catching up on Pogo and his hilarious band of pals.

Incidentally, Pogo did return to the funny pages, although obviously with new artists behind the strip. Almost universally panned, I didn't mind it so much. The new stips are of the same stylistic quality that has been lacking in newspaper comics since the 70s, even if Walt Kelly himself isn't doing the strip.

In recent years, I've also learned that Pogo For President wasn't the only animated feature based on Pogo. There was another special, entitled The Pogo Special Birthday Special, animated traditionally by Looney Tunes veteran Chuck Jones. The cartoon predates its claymation counterpart, and, naturally, all the voices are completely different. Still, it was a pleasant surprise to find this. And thanks to Youtube, we now have the ability to see it...



What petition do we have to sign to get these two pieces of animation on DVD? Together, even! No sense in releasing them separately. I'd pay for it.

Editorial Note: Hey, wait a minute! I ran some system updates this morning, and Ijust noticed that the YouTube videos no longer have that annoying "Click to activate" thing anymore. Did Microsoft finally pay off whoever it was that was making them do that? At last!
linktalk nerdy to me

Apple Milk! Nani?! [Apr. 8th, 2008|06:25 pm]
This girl is hilarious. She's an American chick who speaks fluent Japanese, and she shares her dorky otaku knowledge to the world via "pretty intense" instructional Youtube videos. Yay, I've always wanted to know how to order ice cream in Japanese! (No, I haven't, but I watched it anyway.)

www.youtube.com/user/applemilk1988

linktalk nerdy to me

Kong Lives!